Category: Anti-Aging

  • EASY Ways to Live Better: 4 Ways EGGS Boost Your Energy!

    Ordering egg white omelets is an idea whose time has come—and gone. (Long gone!) Trust me, Mother Nature put the egg together the way she did for a reason.

     

    Eggs—yolks and all—contain more than 15 different vitamins and minerals, including double-digit percentages of the daily value for important energy vitamins such as riboflavin (vitamin B2) and vitamin B12, not to mention some of the highest quality protein on the planet. And that’s a great recipe for energy!

     

    Image courtesy of FreeDigitalPhotos.net
    Image courtesy of FreeDigitalPhotos.net

    #1. The yolk is a rich source of an essential nutrient called choline, which is usually thought of as a member of the B-vitamin family. Choline is needed for the synthesis of acetylcholine.

     

    #2. Having adequate levels of acetylcholine also helps protect against dementia! Why? Acetylcholine is actually one of the major neurotransmitters in the body. That means it helps transmit information in the brain and is absolutely critical for MEMORY and thought.

    #3. It’s all interrelated. The choline in egg yolks also helps the body form a chemical called betaine, which in turn, reduces another body chemical called homocysteine. Homocysteine can slow you down in a number of ways. It’s a nasty little chemical compound that is made naturally in the body—but when it builds up, it can contribute to inflammation and increase the risk for heart disease and stroke, both of which are not exactly at the top of your must-have list. High levels of homocysteine are also linked to greater risk of fractures, which isn’t something that’s likely to increase your get up and go either.

    #4. If all that were not enough, the choline and phosphatidylcholine* in egg yolks help the liver get rid of the kinds of toxins that can drain your energy. Remember that the liver is ground ZERO for detoxification, and the more help you can give it, the better off you’ll be. With the number of energy-zapping toxins we’re exposed to on a daily basis, your liver a can use all the help it can get.

    Remember, in today’s world, we need to proactively seek the healthy version of EVERYTHING. So spend the extra two or three dollars and get yourself organic eggs from cage-free chickens. If the $2 feels like a stretch, just give up one bucks a week or some other daily indulgence and you’ll be able to get TWO dozen luxurious, energy-packed orbs.

    Eggs—complete with the nutritious yolk—can help. Eggs truly are an energy superfood.

     

    *A close relative of choline.

     

     

     

  • Melatonin: So Much More Than A Sleep Aid

    Melatonin: So Much More Than A Sleep Aid

    Here’s a riddle for you: Why do blind women get breast cancer at about half the rate that sighted women do?

    We think it has to do with two things: light, and a hormone called melatonin.

    Most people who have heard of melatonin know it as a supplement that can help with sleep (which it definitely can). And it’s great for jet lag. But the melatonin story is a lot more interesting– and complicated– than its ability to serve as a natural cure for insomnia.

    Melatonin may have a role in protecting you against cancer. It also supports the immune system and is one of the most powerful antioxidants we know of. It protects cell membranes even more than vitamin E does, and is more effective than glutathione (an important antioxidant in the body) at neutralizing a deadly free radical that causes oxidative damage, hydroxyl radicals.

    So although melatonin is not by itself a miracle anti-aging supplement, it helps protect against a number of age-robbers.

    Take sleep, for example.

    During sleep, a great deal of cellular damage that occurs during the day is repaired and that repair process is initiated by secretions of melatonin. And because disturbed sleep so often accompanies aging, anything that can help us sleep better (with ancillary benefits to boot and no side effects) might be something to take note of. Melatonin definitely fits the bill.

    Poor sleep quality reduces the secretion of growth hormone, an important hormone that helps us keep muscle and lose fat. It may also raise levels of stress hormones such as cortisol.Lack of rest or disruption of normal sleep patterns can increase hunger, leading to obesity-related illnesses and accelerated aging. Because melatonin is so helpful in getting a good night’s sleep, the use of melatonin as a supplement may have far-reaching consequences for many of the conditions that interfere with healthy aging.

    And if all this weren’t enough, melatonin may also be good for the heart. Researchers tested melatonin supplements on women aged forty-seven to sixty-three and found that supplementation improved the “day-night” rhythm of blood pressure, significantly decreasing nighttime blood pressure.

    “Melatonin, in addition to being an incredibly powerful antioxidant, may well turn out to be cardio-protective”, says Beth Traylor, MD, of Cenegenics Medical Institute.

    Melatonin is a hugely important hormone with many overlapping benefits. virtually everyone over the age of forty doesn’t make enough, and taking a little extra doesn’t seem to have any negative side effects.

    Melatonin has been used successfully as a supplement for sleep in doses from as low as 0.1 mg to as much as 10mg.

  • What Really Makes Us Healthy: The X-Factor

    What are the most important foods for vitality and good health?

    What are the most important supplements to take?

    What are the best exercises to do?

    If I had $7.95 for every story that’s ever been written about some variation of one of those three questions, I’d be writing this from my newly purchased villa in the south of France.

    I get interviewed by magazines writers a lot, and if I had to characterize what we talk about in one succinct phrase I’d say, “we talk about the secrets to health”.

    The interview, mind you, could be about anything. The writer could be asking me about superfoods, vitamins, fitness, even more “esoteric” things like stress reduction and sleep, but ultimately the purpose is to give the reader some new information about the “secret” to good health.

    Which is something I’ve been thinking about a lot recently.

    That led to my asking myself, what makes me, personally, healthy?

    Sure, I eat the right foods (most of the time). I regularly take nutritional supplements. I have my hormones monitored. I exercise regularly.

    And if I were a research scientist, studying “me”, I’d probably think I had accounted for all the “variables”.

    Food? Check.

    Supplements? Check.

    Sleep? Stress Reduction? Yup.

    Good genes? Probably, who knows.

    But there’s something else.

    I call it the X factor– and every one of us has a version of it.

    (more…)

  • Are Your Hormones Wreaking Havoc on Your Health?

    Today’s message is just for the ladies…

    I just got done recording a fantastic interview with female hormone specialist Dr. Anna Cabeca.

    She has helped countless women who were suffering with these (and other) hormone-based health problems:

    • Low energy
    • Trouble sleeping
    • Anxiety or Depression
    • Memory problems
    • Weight gain
    • Low sex drive

    (more…)

  • 15% of Seniors Are Clinically Low in This Vitamin…

    In his book, Your Nutrition Prescription, Dr. H.L. Newbold, tells the story of a 76-year old German woman who came to see him.

    She had been crying uncontrollably for 6 months and was unable to function fully because of her state.  Despite a normal B12 blood level he still gave her an injection of B12.

    She returned to his office three days later, no longer crying, reporting that she had felt stronger than she’d felt in a long time and she was even able to sleep through the night for the first time in many nights.  Three days after that she was actually happy again that she was able to do her housekeeping.

    And that, my friends, is the dramatic effect that B12 can have on the elderly.

    Are YOU Low?

    If there’s one vitamin that older people are frequently low in, it’s vitamin B12. In one study, 15% of adults older than 65 had clinically low levels of this vitally important vitamin, and most nutritionists think the number is much higher.

    One of the reasons you may be low in vitamin B12 is that in order to absorb it, you need a protein found in the gastric juice of the stomach called intrinsic factor. As we get older we make less acid, and have less intrinsic factor. Antacids play havoc with the ability to make this critical chemical, without which we won’t absorb much vitamin B12, even if we’re eating plenty of it.

    Additional symptoms of B12 deficiency include depression and low energy. And B12 is critical for reducing homocysteine, a nasty amino acid that can increase the risk of heart attack and stroke. Research has shown that high levels of homocysteine double the risk of dementia or cognitive impairment.

    B12 and Alzheimer’s

    And before I forget, let’s talk about Alzheimer’s. There was an interesting study done in Wales, which looked at whether or not Alzheimer’s disease was a result of vitamin B12 deficiency. While this subject is still hotly debated among physicians, this study seemed to show very clearly that there is indeed a link. Researchers evaluated members of a family with a genetic predisposition towards Alzheimer’s disease. They found that 67 percent of  family members with confirmed Alzheimer’s disease also had abnormally low blood levels of vitamin B12, compared to 8 percent who were at equal genetic risk for developing Alzheimer’s but did not.

    More Praise for B12

    But you don’t have to be old to take B12. In fact there is a litany of other reasons why it’s important to keep your B12 status at adequate levels.  B12 can help remineralize bones, inhibit the replication of the HIV virus and has been shown to be effective against asthma if the asthma is sulfite induced.  And B12 can greatly improve nervous system function which also makes it beneficial for those with diabetic neuropathy and multiple sclerosis. It protects against environmental toxins, enhances immunity and may even help with sleep disorders.

    A Note for My Vegetarian and Vegan Friends

    Vegetarians- and especially vegans- are also at risk for vitamin B12 deficiencies, not only because they don’t get much from their food, but because they often don’t eat enough protein to make the essential “intrinsic factor”. Foods that are high in B12 include clams, liver, trout, sockeye salmon and beef.

    How to Take B12

    For most people, at the very least a multivitamin with all the B’s makes a lot of sense. And many people find that they just feel a bit better when they take a high-quality B complex as well. Remember that if you take B12 as a separate supplement, take it separately from the B complex. The B’s work like an orchestra and are best taken together. Any member of the B family- like B12- that you take in addition, should be taken separately.

    Jonny Recommends

    Vitamin B12 Lozenges by Designs for Health »

    We like this formulation for two reasons:

    1. It’s the methylcobalamin form of B12 which is much better, eliminating the need for the liver to convert the cheaper cyanocobalamin to the active form of vitamin B12.
    2. It’s a lozenge. The body’s able to absorb B12 directly through the mucosal tissue of the mouth making this an ideal way to increase B12 levels quickly.
  • The Health Report You Never Read

    I know you get a million newsletters like this with scary headlines like “The Doctors Report THEY Don’t Want You To See” and other garbage like that, but today I’m going to tell you about a REAL health report, one that got exactly zero media attention, which is why I’m pretty sure you haven’t seen or heard of it. It’s called “The Bellagio Report on Healthy Agriculture, Healthy Nutrition, Healthy People” and it was published recently here.

    The Bellagio report was the outgrowth of a meeting that took place at the Rockefeller Foundation Bellagio Center in Italy in late 2012.

    The meeting was sponsored by the Center for Genetics, Nutrition and Health in Washington, DC, the Rockefeller Foundation, Green Templeton College of the University of Oxford, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, and many others.

    The meeting was, as they called it, “science-based but policy oriented”. Nineteen participants, including distinguished doctors, nutritionists, agriculturists, economics, policy experts, representatives of industry and other luminaries gathered to put together a series of recommendations on what governments and people could do to better improve the health of the world and to stem the tide of obesity and associated diseases.

    Interested in what they came up with?

    I thought you might be.

    But first let me tell you one word that did not get mentioned in the entire report: Cholesterol. And saturated fat got almost no attention.

    But the report was not short on recommendations nor on conclusions.

    Basically, the committee said, in no uncertain or wishy-washy terms, that we have a huge problem and it’s name is sugar. And they affirmed in tones worthy of an outraged senator, that a calorie is NOT just a calorie, and that fructose has some very specific, peculiar effects that other calories do not have.

    For example: it creates insulin resistance, raises triglycerides (and the risk for heart disease), causes fatty liver disease, may contribute to cancer, and… pay attention now, cause they actually said this.. it’s addictive.

    That’s addictive as in cocaine or alcohol or heroin. And research scientists do not tend to use that word lightly, by the way.

    Now if that’s all they said, I would say bring out the castanets and let’s rejoice. But they did even better.

    They also said that the imbalance between omega 6 and omega 3 is one of the greatest health challenges of our time and that we better get it right or all hell is gonna break loose.

    Not only did they get the two big things right on the money—sugar/fructose, omega 6: omega 3 balance— but they did it without a trace of the usual claptrap about avoiding saturated fat and cholesterol and eating more “healthy” vegetable fats. In fact, eating more vegetable fat (corn oil, canola, safflower, soybean, etc) would directly contradict their advice, since the report warned of the dangers of out-of-control omega-6 consumption coupled with miserly portions of omega-3’s. (Basically, the way most of America eats.)

    The main source of omega-6’s in our diet?

    You guessed it.. vegetable oils.

    Now, you could probably say, Dr. Jonny, you’re just characterizing this report, you’re exaggerating, this is just what you want to hear.

    Well, it is what I very much wanted to hear, but I’ll let you be the judge. Here are words and recommendations taken directly from the report, which you can download yourself here.

    The report concludes that sugar consumption, especially in the form of high energy fructose in soft drinks, poses a major and insidious health threat, especially in children..”

    “Most diets… are deficient in omega-3 fatty acids and too high in omega-6 fatty acids.” …modern diets can contain as much as fifty to a hundred times more omega-6 than omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. The evidence that this imbalance contributes to disease is now convincing…”“(T)he dietary intake of vegetable oils high in omega-6 fatty acids increases the risk for cardiovascular disease as a function of genetic variation in European populations and perhaps even more so in populations of African ancestry…”

    I love this one:

    There is increasing evidence from experimental and clinical studies that intake of added sugars not only increases the well-known risk of caries, but also risk of cardiovascular disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity, diabetes, and possibly even cancer.

    In the next quote, they start by making note of the fact that some “authorities”—largely funded by the food industry—try to argue that the only thing “bad” about sugar is just empty calories.

    Hogwash, said the committee.

    “While some authorities, primarily those funded by the food industry, have argued that the high amounts of added sugars in food and beverages may contribute to health risks solely as a consequence of their caloric content, there is also mounting evidence that fructose may have a specific ability to cause fatty liver (which can progress to cirrhosis of the liver), high triglycerides in blood (which can contribute to cardiovascular disease), insulin resistance (leading to type 2 diabetes) and increased appetite (which obviously can lead to obesity).

    Kinda makes you want to yell in your best Oprah voice: “Wake UP, People!!!”

  • 6 Toxic Chemicals Lurking in Your Favorite Skin Care Products

    If you read my blog then you probably spend a lot of time at the grocery store scanning food labels for toxic ingredients like trans fats and MSG.

    But I’m willing to bet you aren’t as picky when it comes to your favorite personal care products.

    Perhaps this is because…

    • There is a lot of info out there about what to “watch out for” on food labels, but not so much about personal care products.
    • You don’t realize how much of what you put on your skin is actually going into your body.

    Have you actually looked at the lengthy list of chemicals in your favorite face cleanser, scrub or cream?

    Long term exposure to some of these chemicals have been linked to horrific health problems like:

    • Breast Cancer
    • Learning disabilities
    • Obesity
    • Eczema
    • Asthma
    • Damaged sperm

    All the details are revealed in an eye-opening new video that is quickly spreading across the internet.

    The video comes with a printable “ready reference guide” that you can use to identify toxic ingredients in your skin care products at home or in the store.

    Watch the Video:

    Six Toxic Chemicals Lurking in Your Favorite Skin Care Products

  • Mediterranean Diet…The Best Diet Ever? Not So Fast!

    Mediterranean Diet…The Best Diet Ever? Not So Fast!

    Last week, the New England Journal of Medicine published a study which, according to the fawning mainstream press, proved “conclusively” that the best diet in the world was the Mediterranean diet, that it protected everyone from heart disease and stroke, and that everyone in the world should be on it.

    Except the study showed no such thing.

    Now, don’t get me wrong. I’m a big fan of the concept of Mediterranean eating, even though I’ve never seen anyone definitively define what “The Mediterranean Diet” actually is. (Check the definitions: most are squishy and vague with phrases like “higher in vegetables” or “lower in dairy”.) We do know that in all styles of Mediterranean eating there is way less sugar. And there’s lots of olive oil, nuts and other good stuff.

    We also know that Mediterranean folks eat their big meal of the day in the middle of afternoon. And that they take naps. And that the men talk about their feelings. (A lot.) And they get lots of sun. And that all of these things have a great deal of impact, though that’s not what gets mentioned when the press talks about “The Mediterranean Diet”.

    But I digress.

    Back to the study. What the researchers actually did was create three groups of people. Group one ate what is generally thought of as a Mediterranean-type diet, but supplemented with lots of extra-virgin olive oil. Group two ate the same diet, but supplemented with lots of nuts. And group three ate the standard, American, low-fat high-carb diet that the diet dictocrats have been pushing on us for decades. The one recommended by such groups as the American Heart Association and the god-awful moribund American Dietetic Association (or whatever it is they’re calling themselves these days to try to reinvent themselves as contemporary. Good luck with that.)

    Here’s what the results showed with laser-sharp clarity: The low-fat diet is a complete and utter failure.

    Both “Mediterranean diet” groups did well on measures of cardiovascular health, and there wasn’t much difference between the two groups. But the low-fat group did horribly. In fact, they did so badly that in the middle of the study, the researchers intervened, and tried to give the low-fat group more instruction and attention to bring them up to speed. Didn’t matter. They bombed anyway.

    Side note that was missed in all the media reporting: The researchers clearly state that they believe the excellent results achieved by both “Mediterranean” groups were largely driven by the supplemental nuts and the supplemental extra-virgin olive oil. Not necessarily the “diet” itself.

    So what have we learned, class?

    We’ve learned that the American, low-fat diet stinks. And that nuts and olive oil are extremely healthy foods.

    As far as the Mediterranean diet being the “best” diet ever, that’s still up for grabs. This study certainly didn’t show that, as it didn’t pit the “Mediterranean diet” against any other diet but the low-fat one; there was no group doing a “paleo” diet, or a “high-protein” diet or a “raw foods” diet.

    And we still don’t have a good definition of the Mediterranean diet. (As my mentor, the great Robert Crayhon once quipped, “People think the “Mediterranean Diet” means adding a bunch of olive oil to your corn flakes”.) And we still don’t know which aspects of the so-called Mediterranean lifestyle are the ones that really produce the results. Is it the olive oil? The nuts? The vegetables? The low level of red meat? The fact that they eat slowly and in the middle of the day? Maybe it’s all of those things, maybe it’s just some of them… this study certainly didn’t address that question, so we can’t say for sure.

    What we can say is this: No diet, ever, in the history of the world, has been higher in sugar and processed carbohydrate junk foods than the one that most people in America consume on a daily basis.

    And no diet is better designed to produce the epidemic of obesity, diabetes and heart disease we are currently witnessing.

    My own personal opinion is you could design a dozen diet studies showing the superiority of a dozen different diets (from Atkins to Ornish to Zone) as long as you compare each of them to the crap we’re eating now.

    With a bar that low, almost any diet is going to look like a superstar.

  • More Statin Drug Deception!

    The following is a guest article by Justin Smith, the man who made the incredible documentary Statin Nation, a DVD I strongly suggest you watch. It’s the perfect companion piece to my new book, The Great Cholesterol Myth.

     

    A national newspaper here in the UK (the Daily Mail) recently reported “How a 40p statin can stop deadly form of blood poisoning”

    OK, here we go again. It’s a great pity that much of the mainstream media no longer consider the implications of what they publish.

    This article relates to a recent study published in the journal Critical Care, which investigated the use of a statin in people with sepsis (which is a harmful or damaging response to infection).

    It was a small study of 100 people with sepsis. 49 were given a statin and 51 were given a placebo.

    I’m not criticising the study itself. From a certain point of view, it might make sense to try the use of statins in cases of sepsis. Statins are known to have anti-inflammatory effects and inflammation, of course, is a key feature of sepsis. However, the anti-inflammatory effect may weaken the body’s immune system overall.

    Another important point is statins, of course, lower cholesterol, and low cholesterol levels have been consistently shown to increase the risk for infection.

    Therefore, as with any medication, the benefits and risks have to be balanced.

    Using some criteria, the use of the statin did reduce the severity of sepsis, however, there were the same number of deaths in both the statin and placebo group. So there was no evidence that the statin actually provided any extension of life. In addition, after one year, there was no difference in hospital readmission between the statin and placebo group. It is also worth mentioning that the researchers measured the patients perceived quality of life index and, at discharge, the people who did not receive the statin had a better quality of life index.

    The way that the Daily Mail skewed the results in favour of statins was misleading. For example, by the statement: “The findings suggest the drugs, which cost as little as 40 pence a day, could help to reduce the death toll from a condition that affects around 37,000 people a year in Britain”

    The study did not find a reduction in the death rate at all. This is factually incorrect.

    And this recent study did not really tell us anything new; it certainly was not newsworthy.

    In 2012 there was a detailed review of the use of statins in cases in sepsis, published in the Annals of Intensive Care. The study can be found here:

    Statins in the Critically Ill, by Isabelle De Loecker and Jean-Charles Preiser

    The authors of this study provide a balanced review of the use of statins in cases of sepsis and, all things considered, there was no clear evidence of any net benefit associated with the use of statins.

    The Daily Mail article also took the opportunity to portray statins as cheap, by referring to “a 40p statin”. I have complained about this many times before, but I must say it again – statins are not cheap, they cost the ‘health’ service in the UK 450 million pounds each year, not to mention the costs of administering the cholesterol test itself, which probably doubles the cost.

  • Statin Drugs May Raise Type 2 Diabetes Risk

    Canadian Press

    01-25-13

    TORONTO – Health Canada has updated the labeling for commonly prescribed cholesterol-lowering drugs called statins to warn users they may be at a small increased risk of developing diabetes.

    The department announced the change Thursday, 11 months after the Food and Drug Administration took similar action in the United States.

    Toronto-based drug safety researcher Dr. David Juurlink questioned why it took Health Canada so much longer to act on this issue than the U.S. drug regulatory body.

    “It’s not acceptable,” said Juurlink, a specialist in internal medicine and clinical pharmacology at Toronto’s Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre.

    “Canadians have a right to wonder why the agency tasked with protecting their health should act so much more slowly than its U.S. counterpart. And Health Canada should explain why.”

    The Canadian Press put that question to Health Canada on Thursday. The department acknowledged receipt of the question but did not immediately provide an answer.

    On Feb. 28, 2012, the FDA announced it had updated labels on statin drugs to include several additional risks associated with taking the drugs, including increases in blood sugar levels and the risk of being diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes.

    In an advisory released Thursday, Health Canada said it has concluded, based on a review of all available data, that the risk of diabetes “appears to be mainly in patients with pre-existing risk factors for diabetes.”

    It lists those risk factors as having high levels of glucose or triglycerides, being obese or having high blood pressure.

    Juurlink said many people who use statins to control their cholesterol levels would have some of these risk factors.

    “When it comes to keeping the public abreast of drug safety issues relevant to millions of patients, there is no justification for a delay of close to a year,” he said.

    Health Canada said it believes the benefits of the medication still outweigh its risks, but it recommended that doctors carefully monitor the use of statins by patients who have diabetes risk factors.

    As for people taking the drugs, the department said users who have concerns should talk with their doctors. It said people should not stop taking the drugs without consulting a health-care professional.

    People who take a statin and who experience symptoms associated with increased blood sugar, severe frequent urination, thirst or hunger, should contact their doctor, the department said.

    Six statin drugs are currently marketed in Canada: atorvastatin (sold under the brand name Lipitor and its generics), lovastatin (Mevacor and generics), rosuvastatin (Crestor and generics), simvastatin (Zocor and generics), pravastatin (Pravachol and generics) and fluvastatin (Lescol and generics).

    The Canadian Press, 2013