The Latest Nutrition Lies from the American Dietetic Association
I have a love / hate relationship with the New York Times.
On the one hand, there's David Brooks and Gail Collins.
On the other hand, there's Jane Brody.
Jane Brody never met an establishment position she didn't like and embrace. She's continued to parrot the low-fat idiocy years past its expiration date, and has acted as a de facto shill for the American Dietetic Associations' brain-dead positions on every nutritional issue she writes about. Her latest piece on Eating Well on a Downsized Budget tells us how wonderful potatoes are and recommends "100 percent fruit juice blends" as a beverage.
In fairness, this is mixed with a generally good message about eating real foods on a budget, albeit, of course, the "low-fat" variety. But the comment that prompted this column was her astonishing statement that canned vegetables are just as nutritious as fresh.
This statement is particularly frustrating because she mixes fact with fiction, lumping frozen and canned vegetables together as if they are the same thing: "One myth to dispel is that fruits and vegetables must be fresh to be nutritious" she starts out, reasonably enough. "Not only do canned and frozen versions usually cost less and require less preparation, but nutrient value is as good or better and less food is wasted".
Note the collapse of "frozen and canned". Frozen vegetables indeed are a great option, and are usually picked and frozen at the height of their ripeness. Canned vegetables are complete junk, boiled beyond recognition and canned with a ton of sodium. Ever try canned string beans? Let me know if you can even recognize them as anything that was once alive.
I might have a love / hate relationship with the New York Times, but I have no such ambiguity about the American Dietetic Association, which is apparently the source of all information about nutrition for Times writers like Brody and Gina Kolata. (Not so for Tara Parker Pope who appears to at least question the press releases from the ADA that Brody apparently uses as source material.)
The American Dietetic Association at this point has no useful purpose on the planet except to protect its union members and shill for its flat-liner positions which are now running about two decades behind their sell-by date.
The American Dietetic Association's latest foray into politics- one of many you never hear about- is to bombard state representatives in Wisconsin to pass a bill licensing who can provide nutrition advice. "While at first it may sound like a noble objective under the premise of "consumer protection" what it actually does is make it a crime for practicing naturopaths, nutritionists, nutrition consultants, Ayurvedic practitioners, and others to offer nutrition advice" writes my friend Wisconsin nutritionist Bernard Rosen, PhD.
The American Dietetic Association has tried this before in other states. Their goal has been to keep anyone without their "Registered Dietitian" credential from being a recognized expert in the field of eating and nutrition. That would eliminate PhD's, MDs with a nutritional background, NDs, CNS's and CCNs. (By the way- I'd love to see the average RD pass the CNS exam. Typical CNS exam question: "The product of enterokinase reactions is:......". Typical RD exam question: "What are the ingredients in a lemon meringue pie?")
Yes, the folks who gave you hospital food (white bread and jello as the perfect recovery meal), who think you can "get all you need from food" and don't need supplements, who think that a diet of 70% carbs is ideal, should be the only ones who are considered responsible sources of nutrition advice.
You may think it's all pretty silly, but virtually every magazine editor in America still thinks that the only way to get the "real" story when it comes to nutrition information is to interview an "official spokesperson from the American Dietetic Association".
That's like getting the "real" story on the Iraq war from the Taliban.
The American Dietetic Association's corporate sponsors include PepsiCo, Coca Cola, General Foods, Kellogs, and the National Dairy Council. The full list of ADA sponsors will show you just how ridiculous this organization really is.
Labels: ADA, advice, American Dietetic Association, nutrition, nutritionist



let'em have it! "Frozen and canned" in the same category....that's a flash of brilliance!
man that post was EPIC!
Give that clown loads! :-)
I wrote a similar one on GAA (gaelic football) check out that nonsense!?! seriously! very similar tone to this article! :-) i posted it on my new blog there recently. . not sure if i can post links here?
http://tinyurl.com/d59ob4
Thanks jonny . . keep em coming!
Bryan kavanagh
I've often wondered why it is that registered dieticians know less about food and nutrition than just about anybody else on the planet.
"American Dietitic Association" should really be called "American Dietetic Assholes" or better yet "Absolutely-no-clue Dietitic-wannabes Assholes"
Frozen and canned... what a joke.
What's next? Goat milk and goat shit?
By the way, I live in Canada so I'm wondering if there's any other asshole organizations that takes it up the ass from the big food corporations like ADA that exist here? I hope not.
Thank You for posting this.
I have blogged a few times about the 'nutrition' garbage Jane Brody spits in the Times.
How the NY Times Keeps Y0ou Fat --> http://healthyurbankitchen.com/blog/?s=jane+brody
Thanks Johhny, please keep up your awesome work!
The American Dietetic Association is very hostile to non-RD's nutrition professionals. There attempt to block other higher qualifying nutrition experts is fraudulent. They also block job opportunities by having employers post for there RD credential only,which is soliciting. One Member of the ADA called CNS credentialed experts as knowledge based nutritionists. AS a CNS myself I found that to be self prophecy because my response was I guess RD's are non-knowledge based nutritionists.
Keep going Johnny!
The American Dietetic Association is very hostile to non-RD nutritionist. There attempt to block other higher credentialed qualifying nutritionists is fraudulent. They even block job opportunities by having employers post for there RD credential, which is soliciting. A member of the ADA referred to the CNS credential as only knowledge based nutritionists. As a CNS myself, my response was I guess RD'S are non-knowledge based nutritionists.
Keeping going Johnny!
For vegetables and fruits nothing like the fresh product, but not all canned foods are bad? What about tuna and salmon or sardines, as you state in your books, good food in a can?
very different "animals" if you'll excuse the pun. Salmon and tuna, though amazing fresh, also can very well when made by great high-integrity companies like Vital Choice. Vegetables.. not so much
warmly
jb
How many of you have ever been through the process to become an RD or have you even taken the RD exam, Jonny? I smile at your ignorance. You seem to be very knowledgeable and I admire that, but you have lept to many conclusions that are far beyond honorable. The Taliban.. really? The ADA has done more for nutrition reform in this country than any other organization out there. As for a CNS versus an RD. I have no doubt that you are all experts in the field of nutrition. With all the resources out there, nutrition is not a secret. There are some RD's who may not be as experienced, but I'm sure there are some CNS professionals who are also less than knowledgeable. As for corporate sponsors of the ADA, I don't agree with Coca-cola as a sponsor, but that does not mean that any RD would recommend or suggest that a Coca cola is a great resource for any nutrition. My opinion of you has dropped significantly because of your lack of respect for other professionals in a subjective field that is always changing. Best of luck in your endeavors.
I respect your opinion, and you're right i've never taken the RD exam. However, let me point you to some of my colleagues who HAVE and who have done both- most notably, Shari Lieberman, PhD, RD, CNS. You don't even want to ASK her about the RDs. Same with my friend Linda Lizotte, RD and many others who have both credentials. They are even more virulent about the close-mindedness and backwardness of their colleagues and of the organization in general than I am.
Remember, i'm not attacking individual RDs many of whom (see above) are brilliant and forward thinking. But they will be the first to tell you that their organization- the ADA- is beyond horrific when it comes to advancing the health of America
warmly
jb
another interesting article that i just read yesterday in the NYTimes is one that was about how now organic foods are just as good as conventional. it was also saying how if you were to eat peanut butter you should get JIF because it is cheaper than the organic one.
THIS IS SUCH GARBAGE!
Thanks for speaking your mind, JB! We need more real information and less pulling of the punches, and you do that for us. Even those of us who think we are relatively well-informed need reliable sources of information; I have never relied on the ADA, but I didn't know the things you brought up in this blog entry. Thanks again!
THUD!
That's the sound of me hitting my forehead after reading the stupidity of the ADA.
How on Earth is it possible that such organisations exist? It's mind boggling!
Austin Lawrence
niceeee... i wanted to get curse them too but held back a little...
:-)
B
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home