Belly Fat Doubles Death Risk
Belly fat is in the news again, big time.
First some background: A ton of stuff has been written about the difference between "apples" and "pears", apples being folks who store their fat around the middle and "pears" being those who store it on the hips butt and thighs. Fact is, all fat is not created equal. The fat stored around the butt hips and thighs- also known as subcutaneous fat since it's right below the skin- might drive you crazy and make it hard to put on your jeans, but it's not nearly as dangerous as the other kind. The fat stored around the middle- also called VAT or visceral abdominal fat- is a metabolic nightmare. Stored deep inside the abdominal walls, it is metabolically active fat that directly increases the risk for all sorts of health problems from metabolic syndrome to diabetes.
OK, now on to the study.
Researchers looked at data from almost 360,000 Europeans who had been enrolled in a larger study called the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. They followed these folks for ten years, during which 14,723 of the participants died. What they found was that men and women with the largest waists had virtually twice the risk for premature death as those with the smallest ones.
According to Tobias Pischon, MD, MPH, the lead author of the study, the single most important finding in their study was that it the distribution of body fat affected the risk of premature death. Where you store your fat is even more important than what you weigh. And this was true even when weight is normal. "There aren't many simple individual characteristics that can increase a person's risk of premature death to this extent, independent of smoking and drinking" said Pischon.
For years we nutritionists have been using a "low-tech" shorthand for insulin resistance: a 40 inch (or greater) waist for men, a 35 inch (or greater) waist for women. Interestingly, that was exactly the number that correlated with a doubled risk for death when compared with smaller waists (less than 34 inches for men, less than 28 inches for women). Each 2 inch increase in waist circumference added about 17% increased risk for mortality in men and about 13% increased mortality in women.
Earlier this year I reported research showing that these numbers (40 inch waist for men, 35 for women) also indicated an increased risk for stroke.
Bottom line: reduce your belly fat. If you're an apple, chances are you're also insulin resistant, and would benefit from a diet low in carbohydrates. In my opinion, that's the absolute best "nutritional intervention" to reduce the most dangerous kind of fat on the body (as well as the plain old garden variety "unsightly" kind).
Just remember that low-carb doesn't mean unlimited calories. The absolute best way to go is lower calorie combined with controlled carb eating. For a good calorie goal take your target weight and multiply by 10. That's a great starting point.
And remember also that you'll not only be reducing your belly fat- you'll also be reducing the risk of stroke, heart disease, diabetes, dementia, some cancers and... oh yes, just plain dying.
Seems to me those are pretty good reasons to start eating differently!
First some background: A ton of stuff has been written about the difference between "apples" and "pears", apples being folks who store their fat around the middle and "pears" being those who store it on the hips butt and thighs. Fact is, all fat is not created equal. The fat stored around the butt hips and thighs- also known as subcutaneous fat since it's right below the skin- might drive you crazy and make it hard to put on your jeans, but it's not nearly as dangerous as the other kind. The fat stored around the middle- also called VAT or visceral abdominal fat- is a metabolic nightmare. Stored deep inside the abdominal walls, it is metabolically active fat that directly increases the risk for all sorts of health problems from metabolic syndrome to diabetes.
OK, now on to the study.
Researchers looked at data from almost 360,000 Europeans who had been enrolled in a larger study called the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. They followed these folks for ten years, during which 14,723 of the participants died. What they found was that men and women with the largest waists had virtually twice the risk for premature death as those with the smallest ones.
According to Tobias Pischon, MD, MPH, the lead author of the study, the single most important finding in their study was that it the distribution of body fat affected the risk of premature death. Where you store your fat is even more important than what you weigh. And this was true even when weight is normal. "There aren't many simple individual characteristics that can increase a person's risk of premature death to this extent, independent of smoking and drinking" said Pischon.
For years we nutritionists have been using a "low-tech" shorthand for insulin resistance: a 40 inch (or greater) waist for men, a 35 inch (or greater) waist for women. Interestingly, that was exactly the number that correlated with a doubled risk for death when compared with smaller waists (less than 34 inches for men, less than 28 inches for women). Each 2 inch increase in waist circumference added about 17% increased risk for mortality in men and about 13% increased mortality in women.
Earlier this year I reported research showing that these numbers (40 inch waist for men, 35 for women) also indicated an increased risk for stroke.
Bottom line: reduce your belly fat. If you're an apple, chances are you're also insulin resistant, and would benefit from a diet low in carbohydrates. In my opinion, that's the absolute best "nutritional intervention" to reduce the most dangerous kind of fat on the body (as well as the plain old garden variety "unsightly" kind).
Just remember that low-carb doesn't mean unlimited calories. The absolute best way to go is lower calorie combined with controlled carb eating. For a good calorie goal take your target weight and multiply by 10. That's a great starting point.
And remember also that you'll not only be reducing your belly fat- you'll also be reducing the risk of stroke, heart disease, diabetes, dementia, some cancers and... oh yes, just plain dying.
Seems to me those are pretty good reasons to start eating differently!
Labels: belly, fat, pre-mature death, study



Off-topic, but Dr. Bowden, could you please give me your email address? I have a lot of questions to ask you. Thanks.
Thank you for the "apple-pear" article...Very well timed for me....One of my clients (I'm a personal trainer-massage therapist)just discuessed her readiness to get serious about her mid-section...Your information will help her alot.
of course! you're very welcome!
warmly
jb
Thank you for all your articles. I have a question, where exactly do you measure your belly fat? Above the belly button or just below it? Also, I have IBS and I simply cannot get rid of my bloated ness, even if I eat right and avoid my trigger foods. So this makes it hard for me to actually measure my middle. To explain, here are my measurements. I am 5.28 feet (not sure how to work out the inches). I weigh 123.5 pounds. On a good day my middle, below my belly button will measure about 34.6 inches. And above the belly button about 29.1 inches. This is in the morning before I eat or drink anything. My stomach becomes even more bloated throughout the day. I know this cannot all be fat, because I’m not that much overweight. Am I at risk?
Hi Jonny,
It seems to me that a 1200 calorie a day eating plan is very low. I weigh about 134 pounds and would like to be 120 pounds, but I don't think that I could sustain 1200 calories a day for very long, nor that it would be necessary for healthy weight loss. However, I truly don't know how many calories a day I have been eating, so perhaps I could experiment with what 1200 feels like.
Amy
Hi Amy-
1200-1250 does seem low to a lot of people, but believe me, if you're getting those calories from MOSTLY vegetables and protein, you'd be amazed at how much food you can eat. An entire bag of spinach (like 5 servings) at the supermarket only hs about 60 calories, even with a pat of butter 160..
You don't have to be obsessive about it, but believe me one can do quite well- and probably extend life- on a diet that's about 25% less calories than you think you "need"... and 1250 or so is not too little to get all your nutrients from if you choose them well.
Why not try it? see how it feels and then experiment..
warmly
jb
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home